Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26671 - 26680 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 26671 - 26680 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
City of Appleton v. Jennifer L. Drephal
of an intoxicant.1 A jury found Drephal guilty of the violation, but the circuit court dismissed the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15701 - 2017-09-21
of an intoxicant.1 A jury found Drephal guilty of the violation, but the circuit court dismissed the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15701 - 2017-09-21
City of Appleton v. Jennifer L. Drephal
of an intoxicant.[1] A jury found Drephal guilty of the violation, but the circuit court dismissed the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15701 - 2005-03-31
of an intoxicant.[1] A jury found Drephal guilty of the violation, but the circuit court dismissed the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15701 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Hugo Bramschreiber Asphalt Co., Inc. v. Midwest Amusement Park, LLC
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2003-04 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2006AP1205 2 case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26525 - 2017-09-21
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2003-04 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2006AP1205 2 case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26525 - 2017-09-21
Amerco Real Estate Company v. 525 Properties Limited Partnership
. Amerco now appeals. II. DISCUSSION This case comes to us after a grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12681 - 2008-09-15
. Amerco now appeals. II. DISCUSSION This case comes to us after a grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12681 - 2008-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gary Curtis
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2884-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11531 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2884-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11531 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Manuel Sergio Martinez
in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), and could not be used by the State in its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18201 - 2017-09-21
in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), and could not be used by the State in its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18201 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
2012 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92875 - 2014-09-15
2012 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92875 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - December 2021
- 1 - WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES DECEMBER 2022
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597040 - 2022-11-30
- 1 - WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES DECEMBER 2022
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597040 - 2022-11-30
State v. Rory D. Revels
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3148-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13200 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3148-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13200 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), and that the expert’s testimony therefore clouded a crucial issue in the case—namely, the victim’s credibility. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304603 - 2020-11-17
), and that the expert’s testimony therefore clouded a crucial issue in the case—namely, the victim’s credibility. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304603 - 2020-11-17