Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26681 - 26690 of 33989 for dismissal.
Search results 26681 - 26690 of 33989 for dismissal.
State v. Chong Leng Lee
to dismiss the misdemeanor charges and recommend a fifteen-year sentence. The court accepted Lee’s pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19895 - 2005-10-10
to dismiss the misdemeanor charges and recommend a fifteen-year sentence. The court accepted Lee’s pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19895 - 2005-10-10
WI AP 121 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2011AP1949 2011AP2692 Com...
was not. Schmitt moved to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction. The circuit court denied the motion, noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87626 - 2012-11-28
was not. Schmitt moved to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction. The circuit court denied the motion, noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87626 - 2012-11-28
[PDF]
State v. Charles W. Randle
a no contest plea to counts one, two and three; in exchange, counts four through sixteen would be dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2202 - 2017-09-19
a no contest plea to counts one, two and three; in exchange, counts four through sixteen would be dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2202 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 127
to suppress, he pled guilty to some of the charged counts; others were dismissed and read in. This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69202 - 2014-09-15
to suppress, he pled guilty to some of the charged counts; others were dismissed and read in. This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69202 - 2014-09-15
Racine County Human Services Department v. Frank W.
. A finding of unfitness shall not preclude a dismissal of a petition under s. 48.427(2).”) (Emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7619 - 2005-03-31
. A finding of unfitness shall not preclude a dismissal of a petition under s. 48.427(2).”) (Emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7619 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. An additional charge of first-degree recklessly endangering safety as a repeater was dismissed and read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717585 - 2023-10-25
. An additional charge of first-degree recklessly endangering safety as a repeater was dismissed and read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717585 - 2023-10-25
[PDF]
SC Clerk-Ltr
. Waukesha County v. J.J.H. Per Curiam DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. Ann Walsh Bradley, J
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258375 - 2020-04-17
. Waukesha County v. J.J.H. Per Curiam DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. Ann Walsh Bradley, J
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258375 - 2020-04-17
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 13-08 - Comments from the Wisconsin State Bar
. The circuit court denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss, which al- leged lack of jurisdiction based
/supreme/docs/1308commentsstatebar.pdf - 2013-12-02
. The circuit court denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss, which al- leged lack of jurisdiction based
/supreme/docs/1308commentsstatebar.pdf - 2013-12-02
[PDF]
Wisconsin Circuit Court Access Oversight Committee Retention and Accuracy Subcommittee October 2005 minutes
, the group was dismissed for lunch. The meeting was adjourned at 12:00 p.m.
/courts/committees/docs/retentionminutes1005.pdf - 2009-11-16
, the group was dismissed for lunch. The meeting was adjourned at 12:00 p.m.
/courts/committees/docs/retentionminutes1005.pdf - 2009-11-16
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Wis Legislature and Republican Senator Respondent's Supp. Memo in Support of Motion to Recuse to J. Protasiewicz
.) (col- leagues dismissive of Caperton “just don’t seem to get it”). The failure to Case 2023AP001399
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0822legislatureresponse.pdf - 2023-10-16
.) (col- leagues dismissive of Caperton “just don’t seem to get it”). The failure to Case 2023AP001399
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0822legislatureresponse.pdf - 2023-10-16