Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26681 - 26690 of 60141 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 26681 - 26690 of 60141 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Jon A. York
to suppress because he claims that: (1) the affidavit in support of the search warrant did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5157 - 2005-03-31
to suppress because he claims that: (1) the affidavit in support of the search warrant did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5157 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Roger H. Schuett
in Milwaukee County. When each of these loans went into default, Community commenced small claims replevin
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17229 - 2017-09-21
in Milwaukee County. When each of these loans went into default, Community commenced small claims replevin
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17229 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rory D. Revels
to the trial court that the summary was inadequate under the statute. Responding, Revels claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13200 - 2005-03-31
to the trial court that the summary was inadequate under the statute. Responding, Revels claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13200 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
standing to assert this claim. We conclude Neitzel did not have standing because, at the time the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23
standing to assert this claim. We conclude Neitzel did not have standing because, at the time the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction relief.[2] Bach claims that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40509 - 2009-09-08
motion for postconviction relief.[2] Bach claims that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40509 - 2009-09-08
Erik Jensen v. David D. McPherson, M.D.
order denying a motion to dismiss the 2001 medical malpractice claim of Erik Jensen, a minor, by his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4533 - 2005-03-31
order denying a motion to dismiss the 2001 medical malpractice claim of Erik Jensen, a minor, by his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4533 - 2005-03-31
State v. Glenndale R. Black
, which the trial court denied. II. Analysis. Black claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10071 - 2005-03-31
, which the trial court denied. II. Analysis. Black claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10071 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a claim and should have rejected Kendra’s motion because Kendra’s motion failed to show a failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185835 - 2017-09-21
a claim and should have rejected Kendra’s motion because Kendra’s motion failed to show a failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185835 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark O. Williams
jeopardy objections, claiming that one of the assault charges is multiplicitous and that the battery charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5692 - 2005-03-31
jeopardy objections, claiming that one of the assault charges is multiplicitous and that the battery charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5692 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
responsibility for Samantha under § 48.415(6). Brenda claims that the evidence instead went to the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72888 - 2011-10-26
responsibility for Samantha under § 48.415(6). Brenda claims that the evidence instead went to the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72888 - 2011-10-26