Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26691 - 26700 of 63301 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 26691 - 26700 of 63301 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
challenges the circuit court’s decision denying his suppression motion. He argues that the officer who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28953 - 2007-05-09
challenges the circuit court’s decision denying his suppression motion. He argues that the officer who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28953 - 2007-05-09
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
criminal offender. Hibbler also appeals from the court’s order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=941051 - 2025-04-16
criminal offender. Hibbler also appeals from the court’s order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=941051 - 2025-04-16
State v. Anthony K. Murphy
postconviction motion. Murphy claims that his trial lawyer was ineffective.[1] We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26099 - 2006-08-07
postconviction motion. Murphy claims that his trial lawyer was ineffective.[1] We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26099 - 2006-08-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the No. 2017AP375-CR 2 circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209835 - 2018-03-21
and an order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that the No. 2017AP375-CR 2 circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209835 - 2018-03-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
for an alternate test, we affirm. ¶2 After his arrest for second-offense drunk driving, Gobis filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31980 - 2014-09-15
for an alternate test, we affirm. ¶2 After his arrest for second-offense drunk driving, Gobis filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31980 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Leroy H. Hintz
. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.1 Leroy H. Hintz appeals from an order denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2809 - 2017-09-19
. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.1 Leroy H. Hintz appeals from an order denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2809 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
motion and the subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959265 - 2025-05-21
motion and the subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959265 - 2025-05-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Matthew Scott appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95062 - 2014-09-15
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Matthew Scott appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95062 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Alfred L. Davenport, Jr.
- motion to suppress. Because the trial court did not err in denying Davenport's suppression motion, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10645 - 2017-09-20
- motion to suppress. Because the trial court did not err in denying Davenport's suppression motion, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10645 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
motion for sanctions against opposing counsel. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102288 - 2013-09-22
motion for sanctions against opposing counsel. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102288 - 2013-09-22