Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26691 - 26700 of 29712 for des.
Search results 26691 - 26700 of 29712 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156350 - 2017-09-21
decisions is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156350 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Joseph J. Paul v. Frederick C. Skemp, Jr.
evidence is also a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Stevens, 171 Wis. 2d 106, 111
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15741 - 2017-09-21
evidence is also a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Stevens, 171 Wis. 2d 106, 111
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15741 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de novo. See Chappy v. LIRC, 136 Wis. 2d 172, 180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139580 - 2015-04-13
to a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de novo. See Chappy v. LIRC, 136 Wis. 2d 172, 180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139580 - 2015-04-13
[PDF]
WI APP 59
standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. ¶20 Moreover, “this court can review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217538 - 2018-10-11
standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. ¶20 Moreover, “this court can review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217538 - 2018-10-11
[PDF]
State v. Matthew Polster
, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21512 - 2017-09-21
, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21512 - 2017-09-21
John L. Gorton v. Hostak
. This case presents questions of statutory and contract interpretation. We review such questions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17159 - 2005-03-31
. This case presents questions of statutory and contract interpretation. We review such questions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17159 - 2005-03-31
Douglass H. Bartley v. Tommy G. Thompson
the question presented is one of law, we review the trial court's decision de novo. Williams v. Security Sav
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8307 - 2005-03-31
the question presented is one of law, we review the trial court's decision de novo. Williams v. Security Sav
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8307 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the existence of a new factor by clear and convincing evidence. Id. We review this determination de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963169 - 2025-05-30
the existence of a new factor by clear and convincing evidence. Id. We review this determination de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963169 - 2025-05-30
State v. Bart C. Gruetzmacher
review de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. See also State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16689 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. See also State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16689 - 2005-03-31
Earl Grunwald v. Community Development Authority of the City of West Allis
of law, which this court reviews de novo. Hiegel v. LIRC, 121 Wis.2d 205, 215, 359 N.W.2d 405, 410 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9858 - 2005-03-31
of law, which this court reviews de novo. Hiegel v. LIRC, 121 Wis.2d 205, 215, 359 N.W.2d 405, 410 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9858 - 2005-03-31