Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26691 - 26700 of 63485 for records.
Search results 26691 - 26700 of 63485 for records.
Duane Gurtner v. Wayne Gurtner
sold and proceeds divided, after the payment of certain debts. Duane and Marilyn argue that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4515 - 2005-03-31
sold and proceeds divided, after the payment of certain debts. Duane and Marilyn argue that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4515 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rule 809.30 postconviction motion or direct appeal was ever filed. Nothing in the record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32408 - 2008-04-14
. Rule 809.30 postconviction motion or direct appeal was ever filed. Nothing in the record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32408 - 2008-04-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162935 - 2017-09-21
a supplemental no-merit report. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162935 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph L. Kohls
). The record must show that the trial court exercised its discretion and stated its reasons for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2687 - 2017-09-19
). The record must show that the trial court exercised its discretion and stated its reasons for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2687 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
A.I.M. Returnable Packaging Solutions, Inc. v. Rose Stafford
. 2 The record does not establish the trial date for the divorce case and the corporate claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7331 - 2017-09-20
. 2 The record does not establish the trial date for the divorce case and the corporate claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7331 - 2017-09-20
Jennifer A. Croop v. Tom A. Sweeney
to support the injunction. Upon reviewing the record,[1] we are satisfied there was sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15289 - 2005-03-31
to support the injunction. Upon reviewing the record,[1] we are satisfied there was sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15289 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard Stoeckel
, yes, yes” when read the Informing the Accused, our review of the record shows that when directly asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5694 - 2005-03-31
, yes, yes” when read the Informing the Accused, our review of the record shows that when directly asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5694 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas E. Richmond
exercised its discretion. Kohlhoff v. State, 85 Wis.2d 148, 159, 270 N.W.2d 63, 68 (1978). If the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11331 - 2017-09-19
exercised its discretion. Kohlhoff v. State, 85 Wis.2d 148, 159, 270 N.W.2d 63, 68 (1978). If the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11331 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Willie Bankston
and consecutive to the three four-month sentences. The record does not show a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8334 - 2017-09-19
and consecutive to the three four-month sentences. The record does not show a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8334 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, response, and supplemental no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220362 - 2018-10-01
record, as well as the no-merit report, response, and supplemental no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220362 - 2018-10-01