Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2671 - 2680 of 16451 for commenting.
Search results 2671 - 2680 of 16451 for commenting.
May a judge meet in chambers with a representative of a special interest group without violating the Code of Judicial Ethics?
the judge. The purpose of the rule is stated in the amended comment, i.e. that maintaining
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=885 - 2005-03-31
the judge. The purpose of the rule is stated in the amended comment, i.e. that maintaining
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=885 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
misidentified. 3 ¶7 Echols reads his trial counsel’s sentencing comments to the circuit court too broadly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194674 - 2017-09-21
misidentified. 3 ¶7 Echols reads his trial counsel’s sentencing comments to the circuit court too broadly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194674 - 2017-09-21
State v. Chad Allan Blodgett
an erroneous understanding of the law when it commented that § 971.17(3), Stats., requires the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14428 - 2005-03-31
an erroneous understanding of the law when it commented that § 971.17(3), Stats., requires the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14428 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
improperly commented on Tucker’s failure to present evidence as to the number of his convictions. Again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34663 - 2008-11-19
improperly commented on Tucker’s failure to present evidence as to the number of his convictions. Again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34663 - 2008-11-19
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Sostarich
concerns, commented that there was no real financial gain to Attorney Sostarich, and commented very
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24518 - 2006-03-16
concerns, commented that there was no real financial gain to Attorney Sostarich, and commented very
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24518 - 2006-03-16
[PDF]
01-14 Amendment of SCR 70.245, 71.01, 71.04 regarding court reporters (Effective 07-01-02)
that the petitioner's comments that accompanied these rule amendments in the petition filed on December 28, 2001
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959 - 2017-09-20
that the petitioner's comments that accompanied these rule amendments in the petition filed on December 28, 2001
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI App 48
unwelcome sexual comments to a junior soldier, showing her indecent photos of another junior soldier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191652 - 2018-08-22
unwelcome sexual comments to a junior soldier, showing her indecent photos of another junior soldier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191652 - 2018-08-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
court sentenced her based on inaccurate information when it commented at sentencing about her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34899 - 2014-09-15
court sentenced her based on inaccurate information when it commented at sentencing about her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34899 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
court sentenced her based on inaccurate information when it commented at sentencing about her daughter’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34899 - 2008-12-15
court sentenced her based on inaccurate information when it commented at sentencing about her daughter’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34899 - 2008-12-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that she is entitled to a new trial because the prosecutor improperly commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923254 - 2025-03-06
argues that she is entitled to a new trial because the prosecutor improperly commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923254 - 2025-03-06