Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2671 - 2680 of 18714 for quote.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to stay married.’”) (quoted source omitted). In reply, Troy clarifies that he does not dispute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249524 - 2019-12-17

COURT OF APPEALS
extensively considered the primary sentencing factors, and quoted from both a letter presented at the original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2009-06-08

[PDF] Parke O'Flaherty, Ltd. v. Patricia M. Knuth
173, 182, 286 N.W.2d 573 (1980) (quoting Note, Attorney Malpractice, 63 COLUM. L. REV. 1292, 1302
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5592 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 12, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of App...
to forecast changes or advances in the law ….” The Lilly court in its decision quoted Strickland, which said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35872 - 2009-03-11

John McFaul v. Henry Martinsen
N.W.2d 567 (Ct. App. 1998) (quoting State v. Hicks, 202 Wis. 2d 150, 160, 549 N.W.2d 435 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26324 - 2006-08-28

State v. John R. Jagusch
of record.'" State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis.2d 175, 186, 483 N.W.2d 262, 265 (Ct. App. 1992) (quoting Lievrouw v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11783 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
as a bar to a subsequent prosecution, nor as a defense to a valid conviction. Id., ¶22 (quoting U.S. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72351 - 2011-10-18

Janice Johnson Kuhn v. Charles V. James
. at 31, 218 N.W.2d at 358 (quoting Giacalone v. Lucas, 445 F.2d 1238, 1240 (6th Cir. 1971)). The factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10921 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
jury trial’ in an unrelated matter in Waukesha County.” (Quoting the circuit court; emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102980 - 2017-09-21

State v. Christopher James
to the victim does not transmute “no” into “yes,” as it once did (see § 944.01(1), Stats. (1973), quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8869 - 2005-03-31