Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26701 - 26710 of 29958 for de.
Search results 26701 - 26710 of 29958 for de.
John L. Gorton v. Hostak
. This case presents questions of statutory and contract interpretation. We review such questions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17159 - 2005-03-31
. This case presents questions of statutory and contract interpretation. We review such questions de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17159 - 2005-03-31
Douglass H. Bartley v. Tommy G. Thompson
the question presented is one of law, we review the trial court's decision de novo. Williams v. Security Sav
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8307 - 2005-03-31
the question presented is one of law, we review the trial court's decision de novo. Williams v. Security Sav
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8307 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the existence of a new factor by clear and convincing evidence. Id. We review this determination de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963169 - 2025-05-30
the existence of a new factor by clear and convincing evidence. Id. We review this determination de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963169 - 2025-05-30
State v. Bart C. Gruetzmacher
review de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. See also State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16689 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. See also State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16689 - 2005-03-31
Earl Grunwald v. Community Development Authority of the City of West Allis
of law, which this court reviews de novo. Hiegel v. LIRC, 121 Wis.2d 205, 215, 359 N.W.2d 405, 410 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9858 - 2005-03-31
of law, which this court reviews de novo. Hiegel v. LIRC, 121 Wis.2d 205, 215, 359 N.W.2d 405, 410 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9858 - 2005-03-31
Jane A. Beard v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.
for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Envirologix Corp. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11754 - 2005-03-31
for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Envirologix Corp. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11754 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Stout
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3803 - 2017-09-20
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3803 - 2017-09-20
State v. Antonio A. Scott
of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14300 - 2005-03-31
of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14300 - 2005-03-31
Sallie T. v. Milwaukee County Department of Health and Human Services
, this court explained that “the foster parent has a right to de novo trial court review of the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11643 - 2005-03-31
, this court explained that “the foster parent has a right to de novo trial court review of the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11643 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Hennings
reversal is a question of law, which we No. 00-3432-CR 4 review de novo. State v. Broomfield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3408 - 2017-09-19
reversal is a question of law, which we No. 00-3432-CR 4 review de novo. State v. Broomfield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3408 - 2017-09-19