Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26701 - 26710 of 29712 for des.
Search results 26701 - 26710 of 29712 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the existence of a new factor by clear and convincing evidence. Id. We review this determination de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963169 - 2025-05-30
the existence of a new factor by clear and convincing evidence. Id. We review this determination de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963169 - 2025-05-30
State v. Bart C. Gruetzmacher
review de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. See also State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16689 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. See also State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16689 - 2005-03-31
Earl Grunwald v. Community Development Authority of the City of West Allis
of law, which this court reviews de novo. Hiegel v. LIRC, 121 Wis.2d 205, 215, 359 N.W.2d 405, 410 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9858 - 2005-03-31
of law, which this court reviews de novo. Hiegel v. LIRC, 121 Wis.2d 205, 215, 359 N.W.2d 405, 410 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9858 - 2005-03-31
Jane A. Beard v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.
for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Envirologix Corp. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11754 - 2005-03-31
for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Envirologix Corp. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11754 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Stout
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3803 - 2017-09-20
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3803 - 2017-09-20
State v. Antonio A. Scott
of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14300 - 2005-03-31
of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Moats, 156 Wis.2d 74, 101, 457 N.W.2d 299, 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14300 - 2005-03-31
Sallie T. v. Milwaukee County Department of Health and Human Services
, this court explained that “the foster parent has a right to de novo trial court review of the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11643 - 2005-03-31
, this court explained that “the foster parent has a right to de novo trial court review of the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11643 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Hennings
reversal is a question of law, which we No. 00-3432-CR 4 review de novo. State v. Broomfield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3408 - 2017-09-19
reversal is a question of law, which we No. 00-3432-CR 4 review de novo. State v. Broomfield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3408 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, subject to our de novo review.” State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763335 - 2024-02-13
is a question of law, subject to our de novo review.” State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763335 - 2024-02-13
[PDF]
State v. George Toland Ziedonis
, and we decide it de novo without deference to the trial court’s decision. See State v. Guzman, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19809 - 2017-09-21
, and we decide it de novo without deference to the trial court’s decision. See State v. Guzman, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19809 - 2017-09-21