Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26721 - 26730 of 29958 for de.
Search results 26721 - 26730 of 29958 for de.
[PDF]
Rita Powell v. Milwaukee Area Technical College District Board
standard as the trial court. See id. Our review is de novo. See id. Consequently, we will affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13153 - 2017-09-21
standard as the trial court. See id. Our review is de novo. See id. Consequently, we will affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13153 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
A circuit court’s competency to act is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165466 - 2017-09-21
A circuit court’s competency to act is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165466 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the legislature to become the de facto attorney general. Indeed, the legislature "is not the state's litigator
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295046 - 2020-12-02
the legislature to become the de facto attorney general. Indeed, the legislature "is not the state's litigator
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295046 - 2020-12-02
Providence Catholic School v. Bristol School District No. 1
to conduct statutory interpretation. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14820 - 2005-03-31
to conduct statutory interpretation. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14820 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 175
to de novo review.” State v. Bintz, 2002 WI App 204, ¶6, 257 Wis. 2d 177, 650 N.W.2d 913. ¶34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34646 - 2008-12-16
to de novo review.” State v. Bintz, 2002 WI App 204, ¶6, 257 Wis. 2d 177, 650 N.W.2d 913. ¶34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34646 - 2008-12-16
[PDF]
Madison Newspapers, Inc. v. Pinkerton's Inc.
rulings raises only questions of law, which we consider de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8756 - 2017-09-19
rulings raises only questions of law, which we consider de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8756 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court has applied the correct legal standard is a question of law reviewed de novo.” Landwehr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521710 - 2022-05-19
the circuit court has applied the correct legal standard is a question of law reviewed de novo.” Landwehr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521710 - 2022-05-19
[PDF]
Michael Green v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
reviews de novo. Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp., 226 Wis. 2d 235, 245, 593 N.W.2d 445
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4493 - 2017-09-19
reviews de novo. Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp., 226 Wis. 2d 235, 245, 593 N.W.2d 445
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4493 - 2017-09-19
State v. Zan Morgan
is “in custody” for Miranda purposes is a question of law, which we review de novo based on the facts as found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4281 - 2005-03-31
is “in custody” for Miranda purposes is a question of law, which we review de novo based on the facts as found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4281 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey Stout
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3802 - 2005-03-31
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3802 - 2005-03-31