Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26721 - 26730 of 84060 for simple case search.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 14, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of App...
for a competency evaluation. Yvette’s attorney indicated that she could not proceed with the case without Yvette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86080 - 2012-08-13

State v. Henry L. Williams
, 283, 603 N.W.2d 208 (1999). ¶11 In this case, there is no dispute that Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3154 - 2005-03-31

James Ronald Gaddis v. La Crosse Products, Inc.
and that there is no prejudice in this case, we reverse the decision of the court of appeals. The procedural facts giving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16934 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Response to Letter Briefs (Citizen Mathematicians)
Commission, et al., Case No. 2021AP1450–OA Dear Ms. Reiff: Proposed Intervenors Gary Krenz, Sarah
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/resltrbriefscitizenmath.pdf - 2021-10-18

[PDF] 2023AP001412 - Affidavits of Service on Respondents
Page 1 of 8 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Case: 2023AP001412 County: Dane, Wl Job:Court: Dane County
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1412_0810affidavits.pdf - 2023-10-16

[PDF] State v. David Barton
2006 WI APP 18 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP905-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20764 - 2017-09-21

2009 WI APP 180
2009 WI App 180 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP460-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44050 - 2011-02-07

Paul R. Sharpley, Jr. v. Paul R. Sharpley III
2002 WI App 201 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-2167 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4291 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 20
2013 WI APP 20 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91634 - 2014-09-15

State v. Henry L. Williams
, 283, 603 N.W.2d 208 (1999). ¶11 In this case, there is no dispute that Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3155 - 2005-03-31