Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26731 - 26740 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 26731 - 26740 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Thadeus W. Stone
. § 346.63(1)(a). He claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress. 2 We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17759 - 2017-09-21
. § 346.63(1)(a). He claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress. 2 We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17759 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bruce Martin
postconviction motion. Martin claims that he did not affirmatively enter any guilty pleas and therefore his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11120 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. Martin claims that he did not affirmatively enter any guilty pleas and therefore his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11120 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under WIS. STAT. § 974.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206305 - 2017-12-26
, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under WIS. STAT. § 974.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206305 - 2017-12-26
[PDF]
Marathon County v. Daniel J. Hart
. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J. 1 Daniel J. Hart appeals orders denying his motion to reconsider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5113 - 2017-09-19
. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J. 1 Daniel J. Hart appeals orders denying his motion to reconsider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5113 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mario F. Blasnig
to §§ 941.21(a) and 946.41(1), STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10263 - 2017-09-20
to §§ 941.21(a) and 946.41(1), STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10263 - 2017-09-20
State v. Mario F. Blasnig
postconviction motion seeking sentence modification.[2] Blasnig claims the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10262 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion seeking sentence modification.[2] Blasnig claims the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the issue on direct appeal; and (3) whether he was entitled to a hearing on his postconviction motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76223 - 2014-09-15
the issue on direct appeal; and (3) whether he was entitled to a hearing on his postconviction motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76223 - 2014-09-15
State v. Larry L. McAffee
modification motion.[1] Because we conclude that McAffee failed to make a prima facie showing that a "new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9247 - 2005-03-31
modification motion.[1] Because we conclude that McAffee failed to make a prima facie showing that a "new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9247 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was a defendant, and denying a motion No. 2015AP2579 2 for temporary injunction related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182855 - 2017-09-21
was a defendant, and denying a motion No. 2015AP2579 2 for temporary injunction related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182855 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
further argues that Hudnall’s recourse was to file a motion to reopen the default judgment, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=915431 - 2025-02-18
further argues that Hudnall’s recourse was to file a motion to reopen the default judgment, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=915431 - 2025-02-18