Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26731 - 26740 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.

CA Blank Order
, this is a postconviction claim of constitutional error under Wis. Stat. § 974.06. Motions under that section may be made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103112 - 2013-10-14

State v. Briann Joseph Block
the motion, concluding that an ineffective assistance of counsel claim must be brought by a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19091 - 2005-07-25

[PDF] NOTICE
. The Administrator of the Division rejected Martinez-Maza’s claim that his time available for reincarceration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29451 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Maurice D. Harris
by counsel’s failure to file a motion to compel discovery because one was not needed. As for Harris’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5764 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
on the application of the ‘bad time’ provision.” Tiggs claimed that the Department of Corrections had incorrectly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32530 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a claim upon which relief can be granted. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110873 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jeffrey E. Sobczak v. Eleanor Ciganek
to present testimony from a vocational expert to substantiate his claim of loss of future earning capacity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3371 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was taken into custody for a parole violation, and Davis claims that his parole agent took his glasses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134620 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
at the postconviction motion hearing corroborated that claim. The motion was denied. Konicki appeals. To obtain a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109188 - 2014-03-18

Robert P. Stupar and Terry L. Stupar v. Township of Presque Isle
appeal a judgment denying their adverse possession claim against Patrick and Cheryl Cherek. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10205 - 2005-03-31