Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26731 - 26740 of 82993 for case codes/1000.

State v. Delbert L. Manke
criminal cases under § 973.08(3), Stats. Manke argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9402 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the DOC notice that formally discharged Olson from his probation sentence for this case on May 14, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246646 - 2019-09-27

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey Raniewicz
began its case. On the morning of January 23, 1991, defense counsel informed the court that Raniewicz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3077 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Marvin D. Clements
in this case?—provides the background for the issue on appeal. When the parties and jurors returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3168 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Appeal No. 2006AP2695 Cir. Ct. No. 2006CV233
) (2005-06)1 to include a noticeable limp. As we will explain, the case also raises a significant
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29212 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Frank Rzepkowski v. Robert Schuenke
there is an exception to the exclusion that applies in this case. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14197 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Court case No. 2011CF1361. On July 15, 2011, he was charged with one count of conspiracy to commit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105319 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Frankie Wardell Simmons
. In these consolidated cases, Frankie Wardell Simmons, pro se, appeals from the circuit court order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4039 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
disagree and therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court. ¶2 The facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32694 - 2008-05-13

Northpointe ApartmentsLimited Partnership v. Board of Review of theVillage of Brown Deer
). The issue in this case is whether the Board acted according to law and whether the assessment was made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8586 - 2005-03-31