Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26731 - 26740 of 62772 for child support.
Search results 26731 - 26740 of 62772 for child support.
State v. Linda R. Cauley
to the court's inquiries, the information necessary to support the court's finding that their pleas were entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9590 - 2005-03-31
to the court's inquiries, the information necessary to support the court's finding that their pleas were entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9590 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence to support the annexation, and the record did not indicate any attempt to “gerrymander
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398946 - 2021-07-28
evidence to support the annexation, and the record did not indicate any attempt to “gerrymander
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=398946 - 2021-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment. In response, the Hornbys filed a motion to amend their answer, supported by the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115628 - 2014-06-30
judgment. In response, the Hornbys filed a motion to amend their answer, supported by the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115628 - 2014-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
supporting it was insufficient to give rise to probable cause for the search; and (2) the affidavit was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89040 - 2012-11-05
supporting it was insufficient to give rise to probable cause for the search; and (2) the affidavit was based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89040 - 2012-11-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In support, Helfenbein explained that “others would perceive [M.M.] as being violent” if he were placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212218 - 2018-05-01
. In support, Helfenbein explained that “others would perceive [M.M.] as being violent” if he were placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212218 - 2018-05-01
State v. Frank Curiel
of the State’s case; (2) there was insufficient evidence to support the circuit court’s order; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12454 - 2005-03-31
of the State’s case; (2) there was insufficient evidence to support the circuit court’s order; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12454 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We address each contention in turn below. A. There was Sufficient Evidence to Support the Jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215809 - 2018-07-19
. We address each contention in turn below. A. There was Sufficient Evidence to Support the Jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215809 - 2018-07-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 03, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
The State acknowledged that several letters of support from family and friends had been sent to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27613 - 2007-01-02
The State acknowledged that several letters of support from family and friends had been sent to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27613 - 2007-01-02
Carolyn J. Bartoletti v. Allstate Insurance Company
) the evidence fails to support the jury’s verdict; (2) the court erroneously instructed the jury; and (3) due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16122 - 2005-03-31
) the evidence fails to support the jury’s verdict; (2) the court erroneously instructed the jury; and (3) due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16122 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven E. Carr
and affirm. Upon a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support a jury’s guilty verdict, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11433 - 2017-09-19
and affirm. Upon a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support a jury’s guilty verdict, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11433 - 2017-09-19