Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26731 - 26740 of 29958 for de.
Search results 26731 - 26740 of 29958 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Donald L. Long
, if deficient, the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law, which we decide de novo. Pitch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7736 - 2017-09-19
, if deficient, the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law, which we decide de novo. Pitch, 124 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7736 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, 305 Wis. 2d 71, 740 N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149521 - 2017-09-21
, 305 Wis. 2d 71, 740 N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149521 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a criminal conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559295 - 2022-08-30
a criminal conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559295 - 2022-08-30
Wangard Partners, Inc. v. Gerald Graf
and application to a set of facts present questions of law for de novo review). When we interpret a statute, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25241 - 2006-06-27
and application to a set of facts present questions of law for de novo review). When we interpret a statute, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25241 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
Jane A. Beard v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.
STANDARD OF REVIEW We review motions for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11754 - 2017-09-20
STANDARD OF REVIEW We review motions for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11754 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI 44
OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ATTORNEY MATTHEW V. BURKERT Per Curiam 10 law on a de novo basis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010469 - 2025-09-12
OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ATTORNEY MATTHEW V. BURKERT Per Curiam 10 law on a de novo basis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010469 - 2025-09-12
[PDF]
HSBC Realty Credit Corporation v. City of Glendale
an issue of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. State v. Waushara County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25766 - 2017-09-21
an issue of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. State v. Waushara County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25766 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James L. Creamer
was harmless—that it did not affect the verdict, or had such slight effect as to be de minimis—we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11430 - 2017-09-19
was harmless—that it did not affect the verdict, or had such slight effect as to be de minimis—we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11430 - 2017-09-19
State v. David C. Liebnitz
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17417 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17417 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. (citations omitted). If the motion does not allege sufficient facts, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32111 - 2008-03-17
review de novo. Id. (citations omitted). If the motion does not allege sufficient facts, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32111 - 2008-03-17