Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26731 - 26740 of 29712 for des.
Search results 26731 - 26740 of 29712 for des.
State v. David C. Liebnitz
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17417 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17417 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. (citations omitted). If the motion does not allege sufficient facts, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32111 - 2008-03-17
review de novo. Id. (citations omitted). If the motion does not allege sufficient facts, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32111 - 2008-03-17
Frontsheet
on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5, 305 Wis. 2d 71, 740
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113971 - 2014-08-13
on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5, 305 Wis. 2d 71, 740
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113971 - 2014-08-13
Frontsheet
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109456 - 2014-03-24
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109456 - 2014-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of facts presented by the defendant constitutes a ‘new factor’ is a question of law” that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926694 - 2025-03-13
of facts presented by the defendant constitutes a ‘new factor’ is a question of law” that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926694 - 2025-03-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then apply the law to those facts de novo. Id. ¶27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526870 - 2022-06-01
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then apply the law to those facts de novo. Id. ¶27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526870 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
Guy Riccitelli, M.D. v. Fredrik Broekhuizen, M.D.
de novo. Castellani v. Bailey, 218 Wis. 2d 245, 260, 578 N.W.2d 166 (1998). All legislative acts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17360 - 2017-09-21
de novo. Castellani v. Bailey, 218 Wis. 2d 245, 260, 578 N.W.2d 166 (1998). All legislative acts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17360 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kimberly Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin
, and are reviewed by this court under a de novo standard. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11886 - 2017-09-21
, and are reviewed by this court under a de novo standard. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11886 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105948 - 2013-12-18
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105948 - 2013-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30319 - 2007-09-18
reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30319 - 2007-09-18