Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26731 - 26740 of 33989 for dismissal.
Search results 26731 - 26740 of 33989 for dismissal.
COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss the repeater enhancer and battery charge. The parties jointly recommended a time-served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73674 - 2011-11-14
to dismiss the repeater enhancer and battery charge. The parties jointly recommended a time-served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73674 - 2011-11-14
State v. Jesse Ruiz
offense, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)3. (2001-02), in exchange for the State’s dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05
offense, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)3. (2001-02), in exchange for the State’s dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Clay F. Teasdale
recommendation for a denial of disability benefits and of the court's dismissal, and for failing to cooperate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19616 - 2005-09-12
recommendation for a denial of disability benefits and of the court's dismissal, and for failing to cooperate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19616 - 2005-09-12
[PDF]
State v. Tecia D.B.
that Tecia had failed to assume parental responsibility for her children; therefore, it dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6838 - 2017-09-20
that Tecia had failed to assume parental responsibility for her children; therefore, it dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6838 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Thompson
that trial counsel was ineffective, we would still affirm the trial court’s dismissal order because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4083 - 2017-09-20
that trial counsel was ineffective, we would still affirm the trial court’s dismissal order because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4083 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
their burden of proof, dismissed their claims, and denied their motion for reconsideration.4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661991 - 2023-05-31
their burden of proof, dismissed their claims, and denied their motion for reconsideration.4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661991 - 2023-05-31
[PDF]
Cindy Schultz v. Victoria Wellens
a writ of mandamus is treated as a motion to dismiss a complaint.” Mazurek v. Miller, 100 Wis.2d 426
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10372 - 2017-09-20
a writ of mandamus is treated as a motion to dismiss a complaint.” Mazurek v. Miller, 100 Wis.2d 426
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10372 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 17
In Wausau’s municipal court, Jusufi moved to dismiss the citations, contending the ordinance’s definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34744 - 2014-09-15
In Wausau’s municipal court, Jusufi moved to dismiss the citations, contending the ordinance’s definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34744 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jeffrey L. Thompson
that trial counsel was ineffective, we would still affirm the trial court’s dismissal order because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4083 - 2005-03-31
that trial counsel was ineffective, we would still affirm the trial court’s dismissal order because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4083 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
with prohibited alcohol concentration in violation of § 346.63(1)(b), third offense. Denner moved to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27165 - 2006-11-15
with prohibited alcohol concentration in violation of § 346.63(1)(b), third offense. Denner moved to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27165 - 2006-11-15