Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26741 - 26750 of 29958 for de.

Frontsheet
on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5, 305 Wis. 2d 71, 740
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113971 - 2014-08-13

Frontsheet
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109456 - 2014-03-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of facts presented by the defendant constitutes a ‘new factor’ is a question of law” that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926694 - 2025-03-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. We then apply the law to those facts de novo. Id. ¶27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526870 - 2022-06-01

[PDF] Guy Riccitelli, M.D. v. Fredrik Broekhuizen, M.D.
de novo. Castellani v. Bailey, 218 Wis. 2d 245, 260, 578 N.W.2d 166 (1998). All legislative acts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17360 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kimberly Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin
, and are reviewed by this court under a de novo standard. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11886 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105948 - 2013-12-18

COURT OF APPEALS
reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30319 - 2007-09-18

Jonas Builders, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company
policy is a question of law that we review de novo. Smith v. Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co., 155 Wis. 2d 808
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2915 - 2005-03-31

Tracie M. v. Andrew J.W.
] While Andrew couches his argument as one of law, which we should decide de novo, we see his challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11823 - 2005-03-31