Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26741 - 26750 of 63277 for records.

[PDF] Brown County v. Kathy C.
that “[t]he record fails to disclose that at the initial appearance [Kathy] was advised of her right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2693 - 2017-09-19

Frontsheet
how return of the record is to be made. Id., ¶8. Thus, the court concluded that the procedures
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103928 - 2014-01-06

Frontsheet
not have a right to the award of damages because only those parties with an interest "of record" have
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82102 - 2012-05-03

2007 WI APP 27
and they would have found him not guilty.” Wille provides no record citations for these assertions, nor could he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27988 - 2007-02-27

[PDF] WI 46
those parties with an interest "of record" have a right to be named in the jurisdictional offer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82102 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 27
that it had to be ‘the’ cause and they would have found him not guilty.” Wille provides no record citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27988 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
[] the record de novo.” But see State v. Avery, 2013 WI 13, ¶22, 345 Wis. 2d 407, 826 N.W.2d 60 (applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186835 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
does not do so, we may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109569 - 2014-03-26

Frontsheet
12, 2002, FAS recorded a Certified Survey Map (CSM) creating from a portion of Government Lot 4 two
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29435 - 2007-06-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of their investigation, law enforcement obtained Thane’s cell phone records. The records showed that the cell phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961645 - 2025-06-25