Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26751 - 26760 of 29832 for des.
Search results 26751 - 26760 of 29832 for des.
[PDF]
WI App 57
an issue of law that we determine de novo, independently of the circuit court. State v. Popenhagen, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996984 - 2025-10-09
an issue of law that we determine de novo, independently of the circuit court. State v. Popenhagen, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996984 - 2025-10-09
State Engineering Association v. Employe Trust Funds Board
questions of law that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court's determinations. Tahtinen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7803 - 2005-03-31
questions of law that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court's determinations. Tahtinen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7803 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
." Id. ¶11 We review de novo "[w]hether a defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92356 - 2013-03-31
." Id. ¶11 We review de novo "[w]hether a defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92356 - 2013-03-31
Frontsheet
. § 893.55(7). Statutory interpretation and application present questions of law that this court reviews de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84217 - 2012-06-27
. § 893.55(7). Statutory interpretation and application present questions of law that this court reviews de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84217 - 2012-06-27
[PDF]
Marilyn Daly v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
review this circuit court’s evidentiary ruling using a de novo standard of review because the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20211 - 2017-09-21
review this circuit court’s evidentiary ruling using a de novo standard of review because the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20211 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 106
2002 WI 106 NOTICE No. 99-2306 This opinion is subject to further editing and mod...
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99564 - 2014-09-15
2002 WI 106 NOTICE No. 99-2306 This opinion is subject to further editing and mod...
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99564 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exercises its discretion is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See id.; see also Evelyn C.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035810 - 2025-11-07
exercises its discretion is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See id.; see also Evelyn C.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035810 - 2025-11-07
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of a statute presents questions No. 2017AP1337-CR 9 of law that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237159 - 2019-03-12
of a statute presents questions No. 2017AP1337-CR 9 of law that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237159 - 2019-03-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
clearly erroneous, but the application of constitutional principles to those findings is reviewed de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315410 - 2022-02-14
clearly erroneous, but the application of constitutional principles to those findings is reviewed de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315410 - 2022-02-14
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the error was harmless presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Jackson, 2014
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118831 - 2014-10-14
the error was harmless presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Jackson, 2014
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118831 - 2014-10-14