Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26751 - 26760 of 74732 for judgment for us.
Search results 26751 - 26760 of 74732 for judgment for us.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: PETER L. GRIMM, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251102 - 2019-12-11
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: PETER L. GRIMM, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251102 - 2019-12-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1). We accept the no-merit report and summarily affirm the judgment, as modified consistent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149272 - 2017-09-21
(1). We accept the no-merit report and summarily affirm the judgment, as modified consistent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149272 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the City of Wauwatosa approved Resolution R-23-42, which granted a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to Jeff
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014859 - 2025-09-30
of the City of Wauwatosa approved Resolution R-23-42, which granted a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to Jeff
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014859 - 2025-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54635 - 2010-11-03
Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54635 - 2010-11-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the City of Wauwatosa approved Resolution R-23-42, which granted a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to Jeff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014859 - 2025-09-30
of the City of Wauwatosa approved Resolution R-23-42, which granted a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to Jeff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014859 - 2025-09-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. APPEAL from a judgment and order of the circuit court for Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109841 - 2017-09-21
., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. APPEAL from a judgment and order of the circuit court for Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109841 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is that a reconsideration motion should not be used to extend the time to appeal from a judgment or order when that time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173720 - 2017-09-21
is that a reconsideration motion should not be used to extend the time to appeal from a judgment or order when that time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173720 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment and order of the circuit court for Dane County: richard g. niess, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109841 - 2014-04-02
from a judgment and order of the circuit court for Dane County: richard g. niess, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109841 - 2014-04-02
[PDF]
Bernice Spiegelberg v. State
. The property had been used in a consolidated form as a farm. At the time of the taking, Spiegelberg had
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20161 - 2017-09-21
. The property had been used in a consolidated form as a farm. At the time of the taking, Spiegelberg had
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20161 - 2017-09-21
Bernice Spiegelberg v. State
. The property had been used in a consolidated form as a farm. At the time of the taking, Spiegelberg had leased
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20161 - 2005-11-08
. The property had been used in a consolidated form as a farm. At the time of the taking, Spiegelberg had leased
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20161 - 2005-11-08