Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26761 - 26770 of 63539 for records.
Search results 26761 - 26770 of 63539 for records.
Jeff Pettis v. John Close
during that period. We conclude that the trial court’s findings were supported by the record and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3609 - 2005-03-31
during that period. We conclude that the trial court’s findings were supported by the record and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3609 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record to dispute the fact that Exhibit B, attached to correspondence dated 6/15/2010 from the law firm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93178 - 2013-02-20
in the record to dispute the fact that Exhibit B, attached to correspondence dated 6/15/2010 from the law firm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93178 - 2013-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report and conducted an independent review of the record. Although we accept the no- merit conclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194417 - 2017-09-21
report and conducted an independent review of the record. Although we accept the no- merit conclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194417 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The circuit court denied the motion on the grounds that because the record had already been transmitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47459 - 2014-09-15
. The circuit court denied the motion on the grounds that because the record had already been transmitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47459 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545758 - 2022-07-19
the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=545758 - 2022-07-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
seeking a different sum of money. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190957 - 2017-09-21
seeking a different sum of money. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190957 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
against police department records. The records linked Harris’ name with the address, showed an April 1955
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36796 - 2009-06-16
against police department records. The records linked Harris’ name with the address, showed an April 1955
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36796 - 2009-06-16
[PDF]
Eugene J. Fliss v. Corrine T. Fliss
. The Fliss heirs first challenge the trial court's conclusion that there was “no basis” in the record from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9057 - 2017-09-19
. The Fliss heirs first challenge the trial court's conclusion that there was “no basis” in the record from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9057 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael C. Yates
. See id. at 506. “[W]hen faced with a record of historical facts which supports more than one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14976 - 2017-09-21
. See id. at 506. “[W]hen faced with a record of historical facts which supports more than one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14976 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
or on the issue of informed consent. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128137 - 2014-11-23
or on the issue of informed consent. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128137 - 2014-11-23