Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26771 - 26780 of 30175 for de.
Search results 26771 - 26780 of 30175 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Rumont Kirkpatrick
, is a matter of law which this court decides de novo. Rewolinski, 159 Wis.2d at 17, 464 N.W.2d at 407
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12485 - 2017-09-21
, is a matter of law which this court decides de novo. Rewolinski, 159 Wis.2d at 17, 464 N.W.2d at 407
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12485 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
on the interpretation and application of statutes and therefore presents issues of law that we consider de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882101 - 2024-11-27
on the interpretation and application of statutes and therefore presents issues of law that we consider de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882101 - 2024-11-27
Frontsheet
erroneous; legal conclusions reviewed on de novo basis). We agree, therefore, that Attorney Washington
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33127 - 2015-03-16
erroneous; legal conclusions reviewed on de novo basis). We agree, therefore, that Attorney Washington
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33127 - 2015-03-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the facts of record.” Id. (quoted source omitted). We review de novo whether the evidence was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854731 - 2024-09-26
by the facts of record.” Id. (quoted source omitted). We review de novo whether the evidence was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854731 - 2024-09-26
2010 WI APP 60
The interpretation of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48168 - 2011-02-07
The interpretation of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48168 - 2011-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS
is a determination subject to de novo review. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73905 - 2011-11-14
is a determination subject to de novo review. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73905 - 2011-11-14
[PDF]
Philip I. Warren v. David H. Schwarz
review de novo. See State v. Carrizales, 191 Wis.2d 85, 92, 528 N.W.2d 29, 31 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11325 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See State v. Carrizales, 191 Wis.2d 85, 92, 528 N.W.2d 29, 31 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11325 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s colloquy is a question of law that we review de novo. Therese S., 314 Wis. 2d 493, ¶7. We look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115580 - 2017-09-21
court’s colloquy is a question of law that we review de novo. Therese S., 314 Wis. 2d 493, ¶7. We look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115580 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 81
review is de novo. ¶16 An enforceable “contract must be definite as to the parties’ basic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201311 - 2018-08-23
review is de novo. ¶16 An enforceable “contract must be definite as to the parties’ basic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201311 - 2018-08-23
2009 WI App 50
a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. at 204. ¶14 There appears to be no Wisconsin case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35920 - 2011-06-14
a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. at 204. ¶14 There appears to be no Wisconsin case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35920 - 2011-06-14