Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26771 - 26780 of 67853 for law.
Search results 26771 - 26780 of 67853 for law.
State v. Robert T. Barnard
the squad’s emergency lights. Although the State nonetheless argues the seizure was lawful under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7451 - 2005-03-31
the squad’s emergency lights. Although the State nonetheless argues the seizure was lawful under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7451 - 2005-03-31
Mark Edwards Dietrich v. Connie Wildo
of office. This issue is one of statutory interpretation, a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13227 - 2005-03-31
of office. This issue is one of statutory interpretation, a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13227 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cesar Flores-Ramirez
insufficient in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7182 - 2017-09-20
insufficient in probative value and force that it can be said as a matter of law that no trier of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7182 - 2017-09-20
Travis Tucker v. State of Wisconsin Division of Hearings
. In January 1997, an administrative law judge determined that Tucker had violated his conditions of parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15390 - 2005-03-31
. In January 1997, an administrative law judge determined that Tucker had violated his conditions of parole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15390 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stephen Pritchard
as to the material facts. When facts are undisputed and only a question of law is at issue, the appellate court owes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8478 - 2005-03-31
as to the material facts. When facts are undisputed and only a question of law is at issue, the appellate court owes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8478 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael G. Kinch
) (falsus in uno not favored in the law, should not be given where discrepancies of testimony can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9976 - 2005-03-31
) (falsus in uno not favored in the law, should not be given where discrepancies of testimony can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9976 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith Beauchamp
This court’s review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question of fact and law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20867 - 2006-01-09
This court’s review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question of fact and law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20867 - 2006-01-09
State v. Edgars Osis
be said as a matter of law that no reasonable trier of fact could have reached the conclusion that Osis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11815 - 2005-03-31
be said as a matter of law that no reasonable trier of fact could have reached the conclusion that Osis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11815 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenny Ignasiak
-defense. The State concedes that the instructions given did not accurately state the law because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15927 - 2005-03-31
-defense. The State concedes that the instructions given did not accurately state the law because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15927 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
constitutes a new factor is a question of law that this court decides independently. See id., ¶33
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245483 - 2019-08-19
constitutes a new factor is a question of law that this court decides independently. See id., ¶33
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245483 - 2019-08-19