Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26771 - 26780 of 58285 for speedy trial.

State v. Michael R. Remmel
of the sentence’s structure when he entered his guilty plea; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for not informing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19253 - 2005-08-08

[PDF] State v. Andrew J. Thomas
. Thomas argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his convictions for first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5511 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
and he is entitled to a new trial. ¶2 We conclude the court erroneously admitted this evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87369 - 2012-09-24

State v. David A. Lehman
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Lehman contends that the trial court exceeded its statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6474 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sean P. Tate
, and testified against Tate and Hannah at trial. Michael Campbell, Marshall Burnside, William George
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13716 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jennifer L. Anderson
and drug paraphernalia discovered in her purse. The trial court found that the statements were made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19414 - 2005-08-24

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Stephenie Ann T.H.
argues (1) the trial court should have granted her motion for a mistrial because a juror received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6156 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
remain in dispute, such that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. We reverse. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83530 - 2012-06-12

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the State petitioned for Childs’ commitment under WIS. STAT. ch. 980. Childs waived his jury trial right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100809 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 163
of reconfinement following revocation of his extended supervision. Collins argues that the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34240 - 2014-09-15