Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26781 - 26790 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 26781 - 26790 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Dale R. Wiegert
of these judgment[s] of convictions into the record for purposes of sentencing at this time.” This statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15069 - 2005-03-31
of these judgment[s] of convictions into the record for purposes of sentencing at this time.” This statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15069 - 2005-03-31
Donald S. Eisenberg v.
had made statements on a television program concerning his belief in the guilt of a criminal defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16842 - 2007-08-21
had made statements on a television program concerning his belief in the guilt of a criminal defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16842 - 2007-08-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
testimony contradicts earlier statements she made. Brandy would have us conclude that once she established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45174 - 2014-09-15
testimony contradicts earlier statements she made. Brandy would have us conclude that once she established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45174 - 2014-09-15
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
on the specific facts of the case? Did the trial court err in allowing Mr. Dobbs'[s] statements to law enforcement
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=1152&year=2020
on the specific facts of the case? Did the trial court err in allowing Mr. Dobbs'[s] statements to law enforcement
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=1152&year=2020
State v. Frank P. Howard
of a prosecution witness's prior consistent statement under § 908.01(4)(a)2, Stats., to rebut a charge of recent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8790 - 2005-03-31
of a prosecution witness's prior consistent statement under § 908.01(4)(a)2, Stats., to rebut a charge of recent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8790 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and unsupported statements such as, “… the exhibits will show there were no serious injuries sustained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50468 - 2014-09-15
and unsupported statements such as, “… the exhibits will show there were no serious injuries sustained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50468 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this proceeding is about here today. I’ve got a number of people. I’ve got victim-impact statements that have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191400 - 2017-09-21
that this proceeding is about here today. I’ve got a number of people. I’ve got victim-impact statements that have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191400 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Court System - Circuit court forms
English Summary English JD-1799 Statement of Guardian ad Litem (Chapters 48 and 938) To be completed
/forms1/circuit/ccform.jsp?Category=21&FormName=&FormNumber=&StatuteCite=&beg_date=12/03/2024&end_date=12/03/2024
English Summary English JD-1799 Statement of Guardian ad Litem (Chapters 48 and 938) To be completed
/forms1/circuit/ccform.jsp?Category=21&FormName=&FormNumber=&StatuteCite=&beg_date=12/03/2024&end_date=12/03/2024
State v. Curtis L. Levy, Jr.
that trial counsel’s failure to object to statements made during the State’s closing argument denied him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17649 - 2005-04-11
that trial counsel’s failure to object to statements made during the State’s closing argument denied him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17649 - 2005-04-11
[PDF]
WI APP 178
: It was clear from [Haywood’s] statements here at sentencing as well as from [Nicholson]’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43863 - 2014-09-15
: It was clear from [Haywood’s] statements here at sentencing as well as from [Nicholson]’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43863 - 2014-09-15