Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26781 - 26790 of 57201 for id.
Search results 26781 - 26790 of 57201 for id.
[PDF]
State v. Cesar Farias-Mendoza
, there is still a Fourth Amendment issue where a person is illegally seized. Id. at 601-02. Here, Farias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25380 - 2017-09-21
, there is still a Fourth Amendment issue where a person is illegally seized. Id. at 601-02. Here, Farias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25380 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. ¶13 “The writ will issue only to compel performance by a public officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31214 - 2007-12-17
.” Id. ¶13 “The writ will issue only to compel performance by a public officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31214 - 2007-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
prong, this court need not address the other. See id. at 697. The issues of performance and prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143722 - 2015-06-25
prong, this court need not address the other. See id. at 697. The issues of performance and prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143722 - 2015-06-25
[PDF]
State v. Edward D. Anderson
that he or she was denied the right to a speedy trial de novo. Id. at 508. The first inquiry is always
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19746 - 2017-09-21
that he or she was denied the right to a speedy trial de novo. Id. at 508. The first inquiry is always
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19746 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 20
not constitute special circumstances. Id. at 314. ¶18 Moreover, County of Milwaukee involved an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58850 - 2014-09-15
not constitute special circumstances. Id. at 314. ¶18 Moreover, County of Milwaukee involved an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58850 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Sheboygan County DSS v. Matthew S.
, and reached a reasonable conclusion. See id. As to the pertinent facts, the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7439 - 2017-09-20
, and reached a reasonable conclusion. See id. As to the pertinent facts, the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7439 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 79
. Id.; see also WIS. STAT. 805.17(2) (2007-08).3 Whether those facts fulfill the elements of a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36484 - 2014-09-15
. Id.; see also WIS. STAT. 805.17(2) (2007-08).3 Whether those facts fulfill the elements of a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36484 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In addition, they forfeited their opportunity for amendment in “the interests of justice.” Id., ¶23. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70430 - 2014-09-15
. In addition, they forfeited their opportunity for amendment in “the interests of justice.” Id., ¶23. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70430 - 2014-09-15
State v. Richard J. Kenyon
we decide de novo. See id. at 54, 429 N.W.2d at 113. We conclude that it could so find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13075 - 2005-03-31
we decide de novo. See id. at 54, 429 N.W.2d at 113. We conclude that it could so find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13075 - 2005-03-31
State v. Latrina W.
of professional competent assistance.” Id. at 697. There is a strong presumption that counsel “rendered adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7150 - 2005-03-31
of professional competent assistance.” Id. at 697. There is a strong presumption that counsel “rendered adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7150 - 2005-03-31