Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26791 - 26800 of 63304 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 26791 - 26800 of 63304 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for revision of that part of a supplemental divorce judgment awarding $1,200 in monthly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46621 - 2010-02-01
denying his motion for revision of that part of a supplemental divorce judgment awarding $1,200 in monthly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46621 - 2010-02-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Allen Buckner, III, pro se, appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92401 - 2014-09-15
PER CURIAM. Allen Buckner, III, pro se, appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92401 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Travis E. Blanks
motion. In a May 26, 2004 opinion of this court, we began with the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20872 - 2017-09-21
motion. In a May 26, 2004 opinion of this court, we began with the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20872 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mario F. Blasnig
postconviction motion seeking sentence modification.[2] Blasnig claims the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10262 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion seeking sentence modification.[2] Blasnig claims the trial court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10262 - 2005-03-31
Marathon County v. Daniel J. Hart
PETERSON, J.[1] Daniel J. Hart appeals orders denying his motion to reconsider the court’s default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5112 - 2005-03-31
PETERSON, J.[1] Daniel J. Hart appeals orders denying his motion to reconsider the court’s default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5112 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thadeus W. Stone
(1)(a). He claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress.[2] We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17759 - 2005-04-18
(1)(a). He claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress.[2] We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17759 - 2005-04-18
Walter L. Merten v. Robin McGruder
the apartment before Merten accepted their application was, in effect, a motion for reconsideration that should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10014 - 2005-03-31
the apartment before Merten accepted their application was, in effect, a motion for reconsideration that should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10014 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the issue on direct appeal; and (3) whether he was entitled to a hearing on his postconviction motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76223 - 2014-09-15
the issue on direct appeal; and (3) whether he was entitled to a hearing on his postconviction motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76223 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, appeals from an order of the circuit court that denied his motion seeking sentence modification based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435309 - 2021-10-05
, appeals from an order of the circuit court that denied his motion seeking sentence modification based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435309 - 2021-10-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Lawrence Davis, pro se, appeals a circuit court order denying his motion for postconviction relief under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189771 - 2017-09-21
. Lawrence Davis, pro se, appeals a circuit court order denying his motion for postconviction relief under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189771 - 2017-09-21