Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26791 - 26800 of 29712 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s conduct constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215762 - 2018-07-17

[PDF] Frontsheet
for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI 45, ¶39, 334
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334393 - 2021-02-15

[PDF] Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
of law, which we review de novo. E.g., Stockbridge School Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction Sch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16940 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d at 510. These are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. I. DUE PROCESS ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267378 - 2020-07-07

[PDF] NOTICE
statutory interpretation, de novo. State v. Volk, 2002 WI App 274, ¶34, 258 Wis. 2d 584, 654 N.W.2d 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40865 - 2014-09-15

Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
that we interpret the above-cited statutes. A question of law is thus presented, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6887 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 41
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81742 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
change of circumstances is a question of law, which we review de novo. Greene, 277 Wis. 2d 473, ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31689 - 2014-09-15

Andrea Driver v. Housing Authority of Racine County
and the federal regulatory scheme. Because this case comes to us on summary judgment, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21280 - 2006-03-22

State v. Michael R. Andrews, Jr.
constitutional guarantees is one of law which we review de novo. Id. Both the Fourth Amendment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16926 - 2005-03-31