Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26791 - 26800 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 26791 - 26800 of 58500 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and marijuana on a previous occasion. He asserts the error is not harmless and he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87369 - 2014-09-15
and marijuana on a previous occasion. He asserts the error is not harmless and he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87369 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, (Wis. Cir. Ct. Milwaukee County). All three criminal cases were scheduled for jury trials before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56876 - 2014-09-15
, (Wis. Cir. Ct. Milwaukee County). All three criminal cases were scheduled for jury trials before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56876 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the evidence introduced at his trial was insufficient to support his conviction for felony murder-armed robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34635 - 2008-11-17
that the evidence introduced at his trial was insufficient to support his conviction for felony murder-armed robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34635 - 2008-11-17
State v. Stanley G. Baker
sexual assault and false imprisonment.[1] The issues are whether the trial court erred by admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7977 - 2005-03-31
sexual assault and false imprisonment.[1] The issues are whether the trial court erred by admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7977 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and he is entitled to a new trial. ¶2 We conclude the court erroneously admitted this evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87369 - 2012-09-24
and he is entitled to a new trial. ¶2 We conclude the court erroneously admitted this evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87369 - 2012-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
rulings made by the trial court in an eminent domain proceeding brought pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 32.05(10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
rulings made by the trial court in an eminent domain proceeding brought pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 32.05(10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. Edward S.
to represent Edward S. The final hearing was held as scheduled on August 27, 1999. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2491 - 2017-09-19
to represent Edward S. The final hearing was held as scheduled on August 27, 1999. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2491 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Charles R. Koehn v.
a reduction of the charge, prepare the client for trial, and inform the client that he had entered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17058 - 2017-09-21
a reduction of the charge, prepare the client for trial, and inform the client that he had entered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17058 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sean P. Tate
pled guilty to reduced charges, and testified against Tate and Hannah at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13716 - 2005-03-31
pled guilty to reduced charges, and testified against Tate and Hannah at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13716 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
trial, the jury returned special verdicts finding both grounds alleged by Brown County. The jury also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108492 - 2014-02-24
trial, the jury returned special verdicts finding both grounds alleged by Brown County. The jury also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108492 - 2014-02-24