Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2681 - 2690 of 69366 for as he.
Search results 2681 - 2690 of 69366 for as he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assault. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction No. 2016AP897-CR 2 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191864 - 2017-09-21
assault. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction No. 2016AP897-CR 2 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191864 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
is ordered. ¶4 Attorney Parks was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1991. He has not previously
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230653 - 2018-12-13
is ordered. ¶4 Attorney Parks was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1991. He has not previously
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230653 - 2018-12-13
State v. David Arredondo
. Garza testified that, on May 4, 1997, he got back to the apartment he shared with Arredondo around 9:30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5626 - 2005-03-31
. Garza testified that, on May 4, 1997, he got back to the apartment he shared with Arredondo around 9:30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5626 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark A. Mayer
of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14514 - 2005-03-31
of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
(2007-08),1 and the order denying his motion to withdraw his plea. Popke argues he should be allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48820 - 2014-09-15
(2007-08),1 and the order denying his motion to withdraw his plea. Popke argues he should be allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48820 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[t]he district attorney, the attorney for defendant, and the defendant, have stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71782 - 2014-09-15
that “[t]he district attorney, the attorney for defendant, and the defendant, have stipulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71782 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
and four years of extended supervision. He appeals. Appellate counsel, Attorney Beth A. Eisendrath, filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114363 - 2014-06-09
and four years of extended supervision. He appeals. Appellate counsel, Attorney Beth A. Eisendrath, filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114363 - 2014-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
Rohrer was called to testify by Dickenson.[2] He was dispatched on January 12, 2014, at 11:23 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143920 - 2015-07-07
Rohrer was called to testify by Dickenson.[2] He was dispatched on January 12, 2014, at 11:23 p.m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143920 - 2015-07-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to inpatient treatment and involuntary medication for a period of six months. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314458 - 2020-12-15
to inpatient treatment and involuntary medication for a period of six months. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314458 - 2020-12-15
[PDF]
State v. Scott M. Sterr
. He also argues that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate the involuntariness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6121 - 2017-09-19
. He also argues that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate the involuntariness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6121 - 2017-09-19