Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26801 - 26810 of 29958 for de.
Search results 26801 - 26810 of 29958 for de.
State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment
, our standard of review of the circuit court's ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10761 - 2005-03-31
, our standard of review of the circuit court's ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10761 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See id. ¶21 State v. Denny established “a bright line standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241187 - 2019-05-29
that we review de novo. See id. ¶21 State v. Denny established “a bright line standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241187 - 2019-05-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a legal determination that this court decides de novo. State v. Swinson, 2003 WI App 45, ¶57, 261 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625488 - 2023-02-21
a legal determination that this court decides de novo. State v. Swinson, 2003 WI App 45, ¶57, 261 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625488 - 2023-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s conduct constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215762 - 2018-07-17
counsel’s conduct constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215762 - 2018-07-17
[PDF]
Frontsheet
for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI 45, ¶39, 334
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334393 - 2021-02-15
for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI 45, ¶39, 334
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334393 - 2021-02-15
[PDF]
Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
of law, which we review de novo. E.g., Stockbridge School Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction Sch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16940 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. E.g., Stockbridge School Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction Sch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16940 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d at 510. These are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. I. DUE PROCESS ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267378 - 2020-07-07
. 2d at 510. These are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. I. DUE PROCESS ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267378 - 2020-07-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
statutory interpretation, de novo. State v. Volk, 2002 WI App 274, ¶34, 258 Wis. 2d 584, 654 N.W.2d 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40865 - 2014-09-15
statutory interpretation, de novo. State v. Volk, 2002 WI App 274, ¶34, 258 Wis. 2d 584, 654 N.W.2d 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40865 - 2014-09-15
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
that we interpret the above-cited statutes. A question of law is thus presented, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6887 - 2005-03-31
that we interpret the above-cited statutes. A question of law is thus presented, which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6887 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
erroneous, and we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303104 - 2020-11-10
erroneous, and we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303104 - 2020-11-10