Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26801 - 26810 of 33970 for dismissed.
Search results 26801 - 26810 of 33970 for dismissed.
COURT OF APPEALS
the weapons enhancer, and would dismiss the other charges in the complaint and would not prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88641 - 2012-10-24
the weapons enhancer, and would dismiss the other charges in the complaint and would not prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88641 - 2012-10-24
COURT OF APPEALS
acquitted Cannon. He then pled guilty to possessing a firearm while a felon, and the trial court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127185 - 2014-11-11
acquitted Cannon. He then pled guilty to possessing a firearm while a felon, and the trial court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127185 - 2014-11-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that dismissed charges were read in at Teasdale’s sentencing in the escape case, also making unavailing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=412058 - 2021-08-17
that dismissed charges were read in at Teasdale’s sentencing in the escape case, also making unavailing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=412058 - 2021-08-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
petition for review on March 13, 2019, and dismissed his motion for reconsideration on April 4, 2019
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451646 - 2021-11-16
petition for review on March 13, 2019, and dismissed his motion for reconsideration on April 4, 2019
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451646 - 2021-11-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the motion. Ingram filed an appeal, which was dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. In January
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194442 - 2017-09-21
the motion. Ingram filed an appeal, which was dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. In January
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194442 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jesse Ruiz
offense, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)3. (2001-02), in exchange for the State’s dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05
offense, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)3. (2001-02), in exchange for the State’s dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05
State v. William M. Schleck
, and the driving with a PAC charge was dismissed. At sentencing, Schleck collaterally attacked his 1995 OMVWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2653 - 2005-03-31
, and the driving with a PAC charge was dismissed. At sentencing, Schleck collaterally attacked his 1995 OMVWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2653 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of burglary as a repeat offender, and the State moved to dismiss a charge of obstructing an officer. Dean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141396 - 2017-09-21
of burglary as a repeat offender, and the State moved to dismiss a charge of obstructing an officer. Dean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141396 - 2017-09-21
Steve Uselmann v. Shawn Klinzing
and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Steve Uselmann appeals from a judgment dismissing his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24798 - 2006-04-11
and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Steve Uselmann appeals from a judgment dismissing his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24798 - 2006-04-11
COURT OF APPEALS
Wealti moved to dismiss the complaint on the basis that it failed to set forth facts establishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37713 - 2009-07-15
Wealti moved to dismiss the complaint on the basis that it failed to set forth facts establishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37713 - 2009-07-15