Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26801 - 26810 of 41443 for she's.
Search results 26801 - 26810 of 41443 for she's.
[PDF]
State v. James Jagodinsky
show that he or she is a member of a “cognizable group” and that the prosecutor has used peremptory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11555 - 2017-09-19
show that he or she is a member of a “cognizable group” and that the prosecutor has used peremptory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11555 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
D.-L. She argues that the court lost competency by failing to rule on the disposition within ten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34851 - 2008-12-11
D.-L. She argues that the court lost competency by failing to rule on the disposition within ten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34851 - 2008-12-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
[.]” The defendant must overcome a strong presumption he/she received adequate assistance and counsel acted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=797950 - 2024-05-08
[.]” The defendant must overcome a strong presumption he/she received adequate assistance and counsel acted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=797950 - 2024-05-08
State v. John F. Draves
information imparted to her by the daughter and Draves’ wife about weapons in the house. She indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10858 - 2005-03-31
information imparted to her by the daughter and Draves’ wife about weapons in the house. She indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10858 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
social worker testified that she interviewed E.W.P., and E.W.P. did not say anything about M.W.P.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250220 - 2019-11-20
social worker testified that she interviewed E.W.P., and E.W.P. did not say anything about M.W.P.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250220 - 2019-11-20
[PDF]
James Reese v. City of Pewaukee
at a different value than the year before, he or she is notified of that change. WIS. STAT. §§ 70.10, 70.365
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3780 - 2017-09-19
at a different value than the year before, he or she is notified of that change. WIS. STAT. §§ 70.10, 70.365
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3780 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
facto clause unless he or she has a protected liberty interest at stake. However, she cites
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103111 - 2013-10-14
facto clause unless he or she has a protected liberty interest at stake. However, she cites
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103111 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in Wisconsin.” ¶6 Outside the jury’s presence, defense counsel moved for a mistrial. She argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85764 - 2014-09-15
in Wisconsin.” ¶6 Outside the jury’s presence, defense counsel moved for a mistrial. She argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85764 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
if he or she has the ability, but refuses, to comply with a court order. Benn v. Benn, 230 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86601 - 2014-09-15
if he or she has the ability, but refuses, to comply with a court order. Benn v. Benn, 230 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86601 - 2014-09-15
State v. Bryan S. Campbell
to her while she was preparing the PSI. Because Campbell acquiesced in the testimony and did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2358 - 2005-03-31
to her while she was preparing the PSI. Because Campbell acquiesced in the testimony and did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2358 - 2005-03-31