Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26801 - 26810 of 83820 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 26801 - 26810 of 83820 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238399 - 2019-03-29
. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238399 - 2019-03-29
[PDF]
State v. Peter R. Burgeson
court was advised that Burgeson would probably plead guilty, but that he had a pending case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13136 - 2017-09-21
court was advised that Burgeson would probably plead guilty, but that he had a pending case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13136 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066767 - 2026-01-23
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066767 - 2026-01-23
[PDF]
State v. Shawn Schulpius
2001 WI 69 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0095 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16350 - 2017-09-21
2001 WI 69 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0095 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16350 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shawn Schulpius
2001 WI 69 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0095 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16350 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI 69 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0095 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16350 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael G. Plourde v. Jeffrey W. Guettinger
case. On appeal, the Plourdes argue that the trial court misconstrued the mortgage foreclosure case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12579 - 2017-09-21
case. On appeal, the Plourdes argue that the trial court misconstrued the mortgage foreclosure case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12579 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the State failed to prove that one of the alleged prior offenses, a 2001 State of Oregon case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248781 - 2019-10-17
that the State failed to prove that one of the alleged prior offenses, a 2001 State of Oregon case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248781 - 2019-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS
, “present[ed] a prima facie case” that Darrow was liable on her claim. Murray has not given us a transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54834 - 2010-09-27
, “present[ed] a prima facie case” that Darrow was liable on her claim. Murray has not given us a transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54834 - 2010-09-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155108 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155108 - 2017-09-21
Jim Mattson v. Thomas O. Schultz
discrimination case. Under the terms of the contract, Schultz was to receive one-third of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9817 - 2013-03-31
discrimination case. Under the terms of the contract, Schultz was to receive one-third of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9817 - 2013-03-31