Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26811 - 26820 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] Douglas-Hanson Company, Inc. v. BF Goodrich Company
. “We review a trial court’s denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14163 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] FH Healthcare Development, Inc. v. City of Wauwatosa
of law” that we review de novo. St. Elizabeth Hosp., Inc. v. City of Appleton, 141 Wis. 2d 787, 790
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7029 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
breach of the plea agreement, a question of law that we review de novo, see Nietzold, 406 Wis. 2d 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959098 - 2025-05-20

[PDF] WI APP 14
review the Commission’s interpretation and application of statutory language de novo. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904271 - 2025-03-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a criminal conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559295 - 2022-08-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448189 - 2021-11-02

State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment
, our standard of review of the circuit court's ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha County Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10761 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 4
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. West, 2011 WI 83, ¶22, 336 Wis. 2d 578, 800 N.W.2d 929
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131079 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2017-18). We also review de novo the interpretation and application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245523 - 2019-08-22

Joseph J. Paul v. Frederick C. Skemp, Jr.
evidence is also a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Stevens, 171 Wis. 2d 106, 111-12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15741 - 2005-03-31