Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26821 - 26830 of 30072 for de.
Search results 26821 - 26830 of 30072 for de.
Joseph J. Paul v. Frederick C. Skemp, Jr.
evidence is also a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Stevens, 171 Wis. 2d 106, 111-12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15741 - 2005-03-31
evidence is also a question of law which we decide de novo. See State v. Stevens, 171 Wis. 2d 106, 111-12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15741 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
A circuit court’s competency to act is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165466 - 2017-09-21
A circuit court’s competency to act is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165466 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard Thielman v. Joseph Leean
for the transport. DISCUSSION Standard of Review. ¶6 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5106 - 2017-09-19
for the transport. DISCUSSION Standard of Review. ¶6 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5106 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s error was harmless presents a question of law this court reviews de novo, see State v. Jackson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774440 - 2024-03-13
court’s error was harmless presents a question of law this court reviews de novo, see State v. Jackson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774440 - 2024-03-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30319 - 2014-09-15
a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30319 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ted W. Urdahl
reviews de novo, while accepting any findings of fact made by the circuit court unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19002 - 2017-09-21
reviews de novo, while accepting any findings of fact made by the circuit court unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19002 - 2017-09-21
Armand Linzmeyer v. D.J. Forcey
of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 427. ¶25 In determining whether a public policy exists
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16464 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 427. ¶25 In determining whether a public policy exists
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16464 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 63
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219258 - 2018-11-09
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219258 - 2018-11-09
State v. Louis J. Thornton
constitutional right to counsel is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3733 - 2005-03-31
constitutional right to counsel is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3733 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kelly Scott Roberts
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8228 - 2017-09-19
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8228 - 2017-09-19