Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26821 - 26830 of 29713 for des.
Search results 26821 - 26830 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment ruling is de novo. L.L.N., 209 Wis. 2d at 682. I am not concluding that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603788 - 2022-12-22
summary judgment ruling is de novo. L.L.N., 209 Wis. 2d at 682. I am not concluding that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603788 - 2022-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202525 - 2017-11-14
now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202525 - 2017-11-14
10AP466 City of Mequon v. James E. Haynor
of erroneous [exercise of] judicial discretion de novo.” Actually, Martindale establishes that a reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54057 - 2010-09-07
of erroneous [exercise of] judicial discretion de novo.” Actually, Martindale establishes that a reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54057 - 2010-09-07
[PDF]
WI APP 60
, which is a matter of law we review de novo. Century Fence Co. v. American Sewer Servs., Inc., 2021 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851345 - 2024-11-12
, which is a matter of law we review de novo. Century Fence Co. v. American Sewer Servs., Inc., 2021 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851345 - 2024-11-12
[PDF]
Kurt Hallin v. John Hallin
of proof is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Higginbotham, 110 Wis.2d 393, 402
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13224 - 2017-09-21
of proof is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Higginbotham, 110 Wis.2d 393, 402
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13224 - 2017-09-21
Thomas R. Ward v. Town of Nashville
. Thompson, 155 Wis. 2d 442, 444, 455 N.W.2d 268 (Ct. App. 1990) (implicitly applying de novo review to issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2481 - 2005-03-31
. Thompson, 155 Wis. 2d 442, 444, 455 N.W.2d 268 (Ct. App. 1990) (implicitly applying de novo review to issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2481 - 2005-03-31
Village of Lannon v. Wood-Land Contractors, Inc.
, we review the statute de novo. Id. In so doing, however, we value the trial court’s opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4880 - 2005-03-31
, we review the statute de novo. Id. In so doing, however, we value the trial court’s opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4880 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward L. Riley
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. 1. Was Riley’s detention valid under the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13903 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. 1. Was Riley’s detention valid under the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13903 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See State v. Nellessen, 2014 WI 84, ¶14, 360 Wis. 2d 493, 849 N.W.2d 654. We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231886 - 2019-01-15
review de novo. See State v. Nellessen, 2014 WI 84, ¶14, 360 Wis. 2d 493, 849 N.W.2d 654. We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231886 - 2019-01-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law which [an appellate] court approaches de novo without deference to the court[] below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164952 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which [an appellate] court approaches de novo without deference to the court[] below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164952 - 2017-09-21