Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26821 - 26830 of 59369 for quit claim deed.
Search results 26821 - 26830 of 59369 for quit claim deed.
State v. Kathleen Wagner
under the influence of an intoxicant, second offense. She claims that the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14868 - 2006-03-31
under the influence of an intoxicant, second offense. She claims that the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14868 - 2006-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
his trial counsel. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s decision to deny those claims without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33804 - 2008-08-20
his trial counsel. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s decision to deny those claims without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33804 - 2008-08-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to demonstrate what would be necessary to remove a guardian. In addition, she audaciously claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98014 - 2014-09-15
to demonstrate what would be necessary to remove a guardian. In addition, she audaciously claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98014 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
out that this court already adjudicated on direct appeal Locke’s claim that the circuit court erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144518 - 2015-07-13
out that this court already adjudicated on direct appeal Locke’s claim that the circuit court erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144518 - 2015-07-13
State v. Todd A. Imme
conviction.[2] The facts are not in dispute. Imme's sole appellate claim concerns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11320 - 2005-03-31
conviction.[2] The facts are not in dispute. Imme's sole appellate claim concerns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11320 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to support the conviction. A claim of insufficiency of the evidence requires a showing that “the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139096 - 2017-09-21
to support the conviction. A claim of insufficiency of the evidence requires a showing that “the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139096 - 2017-09-21
Kim A. Noordover v. John A. Noordover
is true of John’s claim that the circuit court’s analysis of Kim’s net worth at the time of the marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18577 - 2005-06-21
is true of John’s claim that the circuit court’s analysis of Kim’s net worth at the time of the marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18577 - 2005-06-21
[PDF]
State v. Ronald M. Vales
the police that Vales and King had robbed the credit union. She claimed that she had told police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10065 - 2017-09-19
the police that Vales and King had robbed the credit union. She claimed that she had told police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10065 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
nevertheless denied the motion because Riddle did not show that he was prejudiced. To prove a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983376 - 2025-07-16
nevertheless denied the motion because Riddle did not show that he was prejudiced. To prove a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983376 - 2025-07-16
Mary McCoats v. Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company
and Robert L. Pugh. McCoats claims that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10522 - 2005-03-31
and Robert L. Pugh. McCoats claims that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10522 - 2005-03-31