Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26821 - 26830 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 26821 - 26830 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the State failed to prove that one of the alleged prior offenses, a 2001 State of Oregon case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248781 - 2019-10-17
that the State failed to prove that one of the alleged prior offenses, a 2001 State of Oregon case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248781 - 2019-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066767 - 2026-01-23
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066767 - 2026-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the centerline. Based upon my review of the briefs and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238833 - 2019-04-08
the centerline. Based upon my review of the briefs and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238833 - 2019-04-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155108 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155108 - 2017-09-21
State v. Julie Dixon
and failed to consider all the relevant facts in this case, we reverse the order and remand with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13355 - 2005-03-31
and failed to consider all the relevant facts in this case, we reverse the order and remand with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13355 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Peter R. Burgeson
court was advised that Burgeson would probably plead guilty, but that he had a pending case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13136 - 2017-09-21
court was advised that Burgeson would probably plead guilty, but that he had a pending case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13136 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152264 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152264 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the judgment roll, “present[ed] a prima facie case” that Darrow was liable on her claim. Murray has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54834 - 2014-09-15
to the judgment roll, “present[ed] a prima facie case” that Darrow was liable on her claim. Murray has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54834 - 2014-09-15
Jim Mattson v. Thomas O. Schultz
discrimination case. Under the terms of the contract, Schultz was to receive one-third of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9817 - 2005-03-31
discrimination case. Under the terms of the contract, Schultz was to receive one-third of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9817 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn Schulpius
2001 WI 69 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0095 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16350 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI 69 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0095 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16350 - 2005-03-31