Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26831 - 26840 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 26831 - 26840 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
WI APP 163
of reconfinement following revocation of his extended supervision. Collins argues that the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34240 - 2014-09-15
of reconfinement following revocation of his extended supervision. Collins argues that the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34240 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. App. 1993). At trial, the jury heard testimony that in the early morning of December 30, 2014
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185259 - 2017-09-21
. App. 1993). At trial, the jury heard testimony that in the early morning of December 30, 2014
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185259 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and marijuana on a previous occasion. He asserts the error is not harmless and he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87369 - 2014-09-15
and marijuana on a previous occasion. He asserts the error is not harmless and he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87369 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that his fire fits within this exception, but I conclude that the trial evidence is sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342440 - 2021-03-04
contends that his fire fits within this exception, but I conclude that the trial evidence is sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342440 - 2021-03-04
[PDF]
John L. Burns v. Douglas M. Scheel
belonging NO. 96-3465 2 to Douglas and Sally Scheel. They argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11789 - 2017-09-20
belonging NO. 96-3465 2 to Douglas and Sally Scheel. They argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11789 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
endangering conviction: he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, and the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28837 - 2014-09-15
endangering conviction: he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, and the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28837 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Outagamie v. Kenneth C. Luedke
that the trial court erred by admitting evidence at trial that he had refused a chemical test of his blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14092 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erred by admitting evidence at trial that he had refused a chemical test of his blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14092 - 2014-09-15
State v. Sean M. Daley
with the agreement, the State would move to dismiss the charges. On January 13, 2003, the trial court approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20346 - 2006-01-09
with the agreement, the State would move to dismiss the charges. On January 13, 2003, the trial court approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20346 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2022AP1284 2 In October 2016, Cornejo was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708334 - 2023-10-03
. No. 2022AP1284 2 In October 2016, Cornejo was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708334 - 2023-10-03
[PDF]
State v. Sean M. Daley
to dismiss the charges. On January 13, 2003, the trial court approved the agreement, Daley entered his new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20346 - 2017-09-21
to dismiss the charges. On January 13, 2003, the trial court approved the agreement, Daley entered his new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20346 - 2017-09-21