Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26841 - 26850 of 29823 for des.
Search results 26841 - 26850 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de novo. See Chappy v. LIRC, 136 Wis. 2d 172, 180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139580 - 2017-09-21
to a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de novo. See Chappy v. LIRC, 136 Wis. 2d 172, 180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139580 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FH Healthcare Development, Inc. v. City of Wauwatosa
of law” that we review de novo. St. Elizabeth Hosp., Inc. v. City of Appleton, 141 Wis. 2d 787, 790
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7029 - 2017-09-20
of law” that we review de novo. St. Elizabeth Hosp., Inc. v. City of Appleton, 141 Wis. 2d 787, 790
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7029 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Jim Smith v. Tracy Williams
6 interpretation, a question of law, which we review de novo. CSO Servicing Corp. v. City of Eau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3393 - 2017-09-19
6 interpretation, a question of law, which we review de novo. CSO Servicing Corp. v. City of Eau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3393 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. George Toland Ziedonis
, and we decide it de novo without deference to the trial court’s decision. See State v. Guzman, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19809 - 2017-09-21
, and we decide it de novo without deference to the trial court’s decision. See State v. Guzman, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19809 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
breach of the plea agreement, a question of law that we review de novo, see Nietzold, 406 Wis. 2d 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959098 - 2025-05-20
breach of the plea agreement, a question of law that we review de novo, see Nietzold, 406 Wis. 2d 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959098 - 2025-05-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to Respondents. Gum appeals. Discussion ¶21 Our review of a decision on summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136500 - 2017-09-21
to Respondents. Gum appeals. Discussion ¶21 Our review of a decision on summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136500 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 14
review the Commission’s interpretation and application of statutory language de novo. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904271 - 2025-03-25
review the Commission’s interpretation and application of statutory language de novo. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904271 - 2025-03-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a criminal conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559295 - 2022-08-30
a criminal conviction is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559295 - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
Frontsheet
conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶ 5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724888 - 2024-03-01
conclusions of law on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶ 5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724888 - 2024-03-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2017AP1889-CR 13 provocation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235521 - 2019-02-20
. No. 2017AP1889-CR 13 provocation. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235521 - 2019-02-20