Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26841 - 26850 of 38464 for t's.
Search results 26841 - 26850 of 38464 for t's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
T. WERNER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Kloppenburg, P.J., Lundsten and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180869 - 2017-09-21
T. WERNER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Kloppenburg, P.J., Lundsten and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180869 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
was a calculated, preplanned event involving three accomplices. See id. (“[T]his court finds completely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35792 - 2014-09-15
was a calculated, preplanned event involving three accomplices. See id. (“[T]his court finds completely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35792 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was spending his confinement were simply “n[o]t facts highly relevant to the imposition of this sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100417 - 2013-08-05
was spending his confinement were simply “n[o]t facts highly relevant to the imposition of this sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100417 - 2013-08-05
State v. Jeffrey Donald Leiser
] The trial court noted that defense counsel did not specifically object: [T]here will have to be some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20285 - 2005-11-22
] The trial court noted that defense counsel did not specifically object: [T]here will have to be some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20285 - 2005-11-22
[PDF]
State v. David William Newbury
for imposing sentence. In imposing sentence, the court indicated that it considered: [T]he gravity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8719 - 2017-09-19
for imposing sentence. In imposing sentence, the court indicated that it considered: [T]he gravity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8719 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of the proceeds.” Matteson v. Matteson, 2008 WI 48, ¶25, 309 Wis. 2d 311, 749 N.W.2d 557. “[T]he settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51059 - 2010-06-14
of the proceeds.” Matteson v. Matteson, 2008 WI 48, ¶25, 309 Wis. 2d 311, 749 N.W.2d 557. “[T]he settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51059 - 2010-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS
…. [T]here should be evidence in the record that discretion was in fact exercised and the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28688 - 2007-04-16
…. [T]here should be evidence in the record that discretion was in fact exercised and the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28688 - 2007-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
to the applicable law de novo. Id. ¶11 “[I]t is reasonable and consistent with Fourth Amendment protections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143838 - 2015-07-07
to the applicable law de novo. Id. ¶11 “[I]t is reasonable and consistent with Fourth Amendment protections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143838 - 2015-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
. This was implied by the court’s statement, “[I]t is not necessary to widen or improve Greatwood Lane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82364 - 2012-05-14
. This was implied by the court’s statement, “[I]t is not necessary to widen or improve Greatwood Lane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82364 - 2012-05-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=412058 - 2021-08-17
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=412058 - 2021-08-17