Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26851 - 26860 of 83454 for case code.
Search results 26851 - 26860 of 83454 for case code.
COURT OF APPEALS
subject matter jurisdiction, we noted “The cases Carter cites in support of his motion reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09
subject matter jurisdiction, we noted “The cases Carter cites in support of his motion reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53196 - 2010-08-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the State failed to establish venue in his case. He further contends that two of his convictions were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231508 - 2019-01-02
that the State failed to establish venue in his case. He further contends that two of his convictions were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231508 - 2019-01-02
Fred W. Schmelzle v. Ken Ade
; that is, the damage portion of this case and prove by competent evidence that the value of this property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
; that is, the damage portion of this case and prove by competent evidence that the value of this property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
Robert H. Diamond, Sr. v. Barbara Ruszkiewicz
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1798
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11011 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1798
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11011 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and could not be used against him in the instant case. The court held a motion hearing on April 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32021 - 2014-09-15
and could not be used against him in the instant case. The court held a motion hearing on April 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32021 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and lacking merit. Brown asserts that WIS. STAT. § 973.15(2) (1979-80) prohibits his sentences in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48910 - 2014-09-15
and lacking merit. Brown asserts that WIS. STAT. § 973.15(2) (1979-80) prohibits his sentences in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48910 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Howard S. Cleaves
instruction properly reflected the applicable law and the facts of this case. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4970 - 2017-09-19
instruction properly reflected the applicable law and the facts of this case. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4970 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. § 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647907 - 2023-04-25
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. § 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647907 - 2023-04-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The circuit court reasoned that the contested case hearing between the District and a District resident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91014 - 2014-09-15
). The circuit court reasoned that the contested case hearing between the District and a District resident
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91014 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, “the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable police officer, in light of his or her training
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91731 - 2013-01-22
, “the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable police officer, in light of his or her training
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91731 - 2013-01-22