Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26851 - 26860 of 29810 for des.
Search results 26851 - 26860 of 29810 for des.
State v. Luis A. Alvarenga
that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. “Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6588 - 2005-03-31
that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Davison, 2003 WI 89, ¶15, 263 Wis. 2d 145, 666 N.W.2d 1. “Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6588 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 163
a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo. State v. Kleser, 2010 WI 88, ¶36, 328 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56883 - 2014-09-15
a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo. State v. Kleser, 2010 WI 88, ¶36, 328 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56883 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ted W. Urdahl
right to a speedy trial presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo, while accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19002 - 2005-08-30
right to a speedy trial presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo, while accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19002 - 2005-08-30
David A.C. v. Veronica L.D.
of law, which we review de novo. Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Anderson, 191 Wis. 2d 278, 283, 528
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15895 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo. Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Anderson, 191 Wis. 2d 278, 283, 528
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15895 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, subject to our de novo review.” State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763335 - 2024-02-13
is a question of law, subject to our de novo review.” State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763335 - 2024-02-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202525 - 2017-11-14
now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202525 - 2017-11-14
[PDF]
State v. Steven A. Avery
we review de novo. See Bembenek, 140 Wis.2d at 252, 409 N.W.2d at 434. We begin by noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11594 - 2017-09-19
we review de novo. See Bembenek, 140 Wis.2d at 252, 409 N.W.2d at 434. We begin by noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11594 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 41
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81741 - 2014-09-15
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81741 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler and Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351 Wis. 2d 123, 839 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204650 - 2017-12-11
judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler and Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351 Wis. 2d 123, 839 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204650 - 2017-12-11
WI App 34 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1769 Complete Title ...
of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. The purpose of statutory interpretation is to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93174 - 2013-03-26
of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. The purpose of statutory interpretation is to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93174 - 2013-03-26