Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26861 - 26870 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court’s error was harmless presents a question of law this court reviews de novo, see State v. Jackson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774440 - 2024-03-13

[PDF] Chris Gentilli v. The Board of Police and Fire Commissioners of the City of Madison
issue, and due process determinations are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25062 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and decide de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30319 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Ted W. Urdahl
reviews de novo, while accepting any findings of fact made by the circuit court unless they are clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19002 - 2017-09-21

Armand Linzmeyer v. D.J. Forcey
of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 427. ¶25 In determining whether a public policy exists
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16464 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
change of circumstances is a question of law, which we review de novo. Greene, 277 Wis. 2d 473, ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31689 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 63
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219258 - 2018-11-09

State v. Louis J. Thornton
constitutional right to counsel is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3733 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Danny C. Eesley
of law that we review de novo. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis. 2d 409, 414, 542 N.W.2d 774 (1996
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17282 - 2017-09-21

Douglass H. Bartley v. Tommy G. Thompson
the question presented is one of law, we review the trial court's decision de novo. Williams v. Security Sav
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8307 - 2005-03-31