Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26861 - 26870 of 57351 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS
that counsel was “imperfect or less than ideal.” Id., ¶22. An attorney need only render “reasonably effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141596 - 2008-07-07

Nu-Pak, Inc. v. Wine Specialties International, Ltd.
a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id. at 232-33, 568 N.W.2d at 34. If they do, we look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3967 - 2007-04-30

[PDF] Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
for incorporation under WIS. STAT. § 66.0207. Id. at 573, 484 N.W.2d at 346. ¶12 The supreme court disagreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5205 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Azis Kochiu
testimony.” Id. A reviewing court will not reverse the trial court’s decision to limit cross-examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15217 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of the municipality’s decision bears the burden on review. See id., ¶50 (“On certiorari review, the petitioner bears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72904 - 2011-10-26

[PDF] WI App 23
of their number might permit the common area to be searched. Id. at 171 n.7 (citations omitted). We look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210365 - 2018-05-07

2007 WI APP 237
to establish [the defendant]’s gang affiliation.” Id., ¶19. Long relied on United States v. Takahashi, 205 F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30717 - 2007-11-27

State v. Demetrius R. Powell
by the police.” Id. ¶12 We will uphold the trial court’s findings of evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5833 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the violation is material such that it has resulted in damages. Id. “Contracts are construed to achieve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74765 - 2011-12-05

[PDF] Midwest Energy Resources Co. v. Wisconsin Department of Administration
and expertise of the agency in the area at issue, the greater the deference the agency would be afforded.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20540 - 2017-09-21