Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26861 - 26870 of 50556 for our.
Search results 26861 - 26870 of 50556 for our.
CA Blank Order
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Eady has filed several responses. At our request
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122951 - 2014-09-28
and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Eady has filed several responses. At our request
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122951 - 2014-09-28
CA Blank Order
with respect to disposition. Upon our independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132066 - 2014-12-18
with respect to disposition. Upon our independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132066 - 2014-12-18
State v. Gregory Mosley
on different grounds to uphold the search, our review of the question is de novo. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2749 - 2005-03-31
on different grounds to uphold the search, our review of the question is de novo. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2749 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2023-24),1 and from the order denying his motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065785 - 2026-01-21
(2023-24),1 and from the order denying his motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065785 - 2026-01-21
CA Blank Order
to be where [she] remain[s].” The circuit court’s findings are supported by the evidence. Our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138094 - 2015-03-23
to be where [she] remain[s].” The circuit court’s findings are supported by the evidence. Our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138094 - 2015-03-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial; and (2) whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek recusal. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114661 - 2026-05-06
trial; and (2) whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek recusal. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114661 - 2026-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or as violating due process, or to seek sentence modification. Our independent review of the appellate Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699527 - 2023-09-06
or as violating due process, or to seek sentence modification. Our independent review of the appellate Record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699527 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
State v. Thadeus W. Stone
denied Stone’s motion to suppress. II. ¶4 The facts here are not disputed, and, accordingly, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17759 - 2017-09-21
denied Stone’s motion to suppress. II. ¶4 The facts here are not disputed, and, accordingly, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17759 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for sentence credit and subsequent motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454111 - 2021-11-23
for sentence credit and subsequent motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454111 - 2021-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
not determinative, is an appropriate factor bearing on our analysis. See id. Considering these factors together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29997 - 2007-08-15
not determinative, is an appropriate factor bearing on our analysis. See id. Considering these factors together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29997 - 2007-08-15